Views: 249
The New World Order: The Complete Undoing of Nationalism
By: @GrubbyGroyper
Much has been said and many have bloviated about the so-called “New World Order”. You hear it all over the place, from song lyrics to news articles to podcast discussions and beyond. But what you rarely hear is an explanation, you never hear the historical context or who is orchestrating it, and you are rarely even given reason to believe it is real. For my first ever published article, I’d like to take a cursory examination of this subject and hopefully leave you, the reader, with a better understanding of how the groundbreaking and unprecedented events of the 20th century have led us to this moment, the battles that are currently being fought, and the implications for our future.
Human history is a very long story, so much so that the things that happened 100-150 years ago, in the grand scheme of things, might as well have happened yesterday. The concept of a “world order” might have been unfathomable for millennia while communication was primitive, travel took ages, and cultures rarely met one another. There were, of course, moments in history such as the Roman Empire, the massive Chinese dynasties, the Mongol hordes that swept and conquered and controlled large swathes of land and brought a singular order to them. However, the roots of the “New World Order” lie in the 20th century.
After the First World War, the German Empire, or the “Second Reich” fell and was replaced by the fledgling Weimar Republic. The world, under the direction of President Woodrow Wilson, attempted in vain to install a world order called the League of Nations, the ideological predecessor of the United Nations, which brought leaders from across the world to agreement to never wage aggressive war again. This, of course, did not last, as from the ashes of the Weimar Republic emerged the Third Reich under Adolf Hitler, who defied the core idea of world order: interconnectedness.
Hitler proved that a nation could sever itself from the international community and still thrive, which was entirely unacceptable for an international group seeking to create world order. The reaction to nationalistic backlash to the world order in Germany, Italy and Japan is well known. It consisted of unspeakable horror, death and destruction. The peoples who stood against the tide of global interconnectedness were divided, displaced and colonized by western styles of government and culture and economy.
With the creation of the state of Israel in 1948, the New World Order began to take shape. As Germany was denazified, Italy was subdued and the Japanese Empire was gutted, the relationship between the United States and Israel became central to the non-communist world. The world was centered around two major powers, the United States (and their Israeli allies) and the Soviet Union. Proxy wars between the two great powers ensued in the Far East as China became Communist under Mao Zedong and recovered from the Japanese conquest to eventually turn into a major power that would take over in the East as the Soviet Union dissolved in the late 1980s.
At the end of his Presidency, in January 1961, Dwight D. Eisenhower delivered his Farewell Address, which would prove to be a historically significant and very telling speech in regard to the New World Order, in which he detailed the so-called “Military Industrial Complex.” In his speech, he said:
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment.
Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction... This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new
in the American experience. The total influence - economic, political, even spiritual - is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists,
and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or our democratic processes. We should
take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable
citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial
and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Ask yourself, have we heeded this warning? Was America considering Eisenhower’s speech when it invaded Iraq twice for the purpose of securing and expanding Israeli power and influence in the Middle East? Is America considering it now as it compounds the danger in Ukraine and perpetuates a war that has killed hundreds of thousands? The New World Order is this: an obstensibly unipolar world controlled by the “liberal democratic” influence of the neo- conservative American leaders acting on behalf of the Jewish lobby who themselves act on behalf of Israel. The New World Order is a world without nations, without borders, without inter- state fighting and disagreement. A world without national interests aside from the Americans and their secret handlers. Why does Joe Biden leave the southern border open? Why does no politician in France bat an eye at the Muslims that riot and wreak havoc in their ancient and beautiful cities?
The main threat to globalization is nationalism. How better could nationalism be destroyed than destroying the concept of nationhood itself? That is why we no longer recognize America, or France, or Sweden, or England, or Germany. That is why we must have diversity and multiculturalism shoved down our throats to silence us. That is what we are fighting against. That is why we are nationalists.
Create Your Own Website With Webador